Japan PSE Certification Guide (Diamond / Circle)
Japan's electrical safety regime is not a single certification but two distinct routes, divided by the risk the item carries: Diamond PSE goes through third-party certification, while Circle PSE goes through self-declaration. Choose the wrong route and the documents, timelines and labels all have to be redone.
Certification Overview
Both are PSE, but Diamond and Circle differ widely in who issues the certificate, how thorough the documentation has to be and how long the process takes. Classify the item first, then talk about process
| Item | Diamond PSE (Specified Electrical Appliances) | Circle PSE (Non-Specified Electrical Appliances) |
|---|---|---|
| Regulator | Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) | Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) |
| Legal basis | Electrical Appliances and Materials Safety Act (per the Ministerial Ordinance currently in force) | Electrical Appliances and Materials Safety Act (per the Ministerial Ordinance currently in force) |
| Applicable products | Safety-critical components: power cords, plugs, adapters, fuses, fuse holders, current limiters, etc. | Finished consumer electronics and appliances: Bluetooth earphones, speakers, cameras, smart watches, etc. |
| Third party required | Yes — certified by a third-party conformity assessment body accredited by METI | No — self-declaration is allowed (in practice a third-party test report is usually attached) |
| Factory inspection | Required, with follow-up routine inspections | Not required |
| Reference timeline | 6-10 weeks | 3-5 weeks |
| Mark | Diamond PSE mark | Circle PSE mark |
| Japan responsible party | Required | Required |
| Technical standards | Item 1 / Item 2 of the Ministerial Ordinance, referencing JIS standards (such as JIS C 6950, JIS C 6065; now trending toward IEC 62368-1) | Same as above |
The timelines in the table are reference values measured from the moment the sample arrives at the laboratory in Japan; they exclude shipping (about 3-5 days), and laboratory queues in peak season can add another 3-4 weeks. Actual timelines depend on product complexity, document completeness and whether rework is needed, and they are not a delivery commitment.
How Diamond PSE and Circle PSE Are Split
The dividing line is not "whether the product sells well" but "whether a failure of the item could directly cause electric shock or fire". Japan lists the higher-risk items with a relatively standardised construction as "Specified Electrical Appliances" and controls them with a diamond mark plus third-party certification; everything else is a "Non-Specified Electrical Appliance", controlled with a circle mark, self-declaration and post-market supervision.
◆ Diamond PSE (Specified Electrical Appliances)
Typical items are power cords, plugs, adapters, fuses, fuse holders and current limiters. These products have a relatively fixed construction, are made in large volumes and connect directly to the mains; a fault in the insulation or the materials has serious consequences.
Certification route: a third-party conformity assessment body accredited by METI carries out the conformity assessment and issues the certificate; the company cannot self-declare compliance. Factory inspection is part of the process, and routine inspections continue after certification.
Reference timeline 6-10 weeks. The documentation leans toward engineering detail: construction drawings, material lists, specifications and evidence for key components, and factory quality control records all have to line up with one another.
● Circle PSE (Non-Specified Electrical Appliances)
Typical finished consumer electronics land here: Bluetooth earphones, speakers, cameras, smart watches and other small appliances. The company confirms compliance with the technical standards itself, affixes the Circle PSE mark and takes responsibility for that compliance.
Certification route: self-declaration. But "self-declaration" does not mean "anything goes" — Japanese importers, distributors and e-commerce platforms generally require a test report from a third-party laboratory as the technical basis on which the declaration stands.
Reference timeline 3-5 weeks, with no factory inspection.
Which Products Are In Scope
A sensible order of judgement is "does it connect to the mains → which item category is it → Diamond or Circle", rather than starting from the name of the product. The item list follows the Ministerial Ordinance in force and its appended tables; the common situations are set out below:
| Product situation | Typical examples | PSE classification |
|---|---|---|
| Safety-critical components | Power cords, plugs, adapters, fuses, fuse holders, current limiters | Diamond PSE (Specified Electrical Appliances) |
| Mains-powered finished consumer electronics | Bluetooth earphones, speakers, cameras, smart watches, common small appliances | Circle PSE (Non-Specified Electrical Appliances) |
| Pure DC / built-in battery powered, with no AC adapter | Battery-powered handheld devices; USB-powered where the adapter is sold separately | Usually outside PSE control; a construction analysis statement can be issued for platform review |
| Mains-powered and containing a wireless transmitter | Wi-Fi cameras, Bluetooth speakers, wireless charging products | PSE (safety) + MIC technical conformity certification (wireless), run in parallel |
Category mistakes usually involve two kinds of product: treating a finished product supplied with an AC adapter as a "pure DC product", and treating the adapter as an accessory that can be ignored. Both tend to draw questions at customs clearance and at platform listing.
Documents to Prepare
Diamond and Circle differ in document depth, but the foundation is the same one: proving that the product's construction, materials and component selection meet the technical standards. Subject to the Ministerial Ordinance in force and the requirements of the body receiving the application, the list usually includes:
Product and construction documents
Datasheet, construction drawings for the finished product and the power section, circuit schematic, BOM, and nameplate / label artwork (including rated voltage, current and power).
Component evidence
Datasheets and existing certification evidence for key safety components (cable, plug, fuse, transformer, capacitor, optocoupler and so on), which helps avoid duplicate testing.
Technical standards compliance documents
Clause-by-clause mapping against the technical standards corresponding to Item 1 / Item 2 of the Ministerial Ordinance, referencing JIS standards (such as JIS C 6950, JIS C 6065; now trending toward IEC 62368-1).
Japanese-language documents
A Japanese manual and Japanese safety warnings. The manual must include Japanese, and the safety warnings must be worded in Japanese; English can only be supplementary.
Samples
Testable samples as required by the body receiving the application, shipped with the full nameplate and manual, to avoid a "sample does not match mass production" finding.
Japan responsible party
Details of a local Japanese company that carries the import and compliance responsibility and handles enquiries from the regulator.
Diamond PSE additionally requires factory-related quality control documents to support the factory inspection; for Circle PSE the evidence chain rests on a third-party test report, the self-declaration document and retention of the technical file.
Japan Responsible Party and Notifying Supplier (届出事業者)
This is where PSE differs sharply from CE in practice. Under the CE system an overseas manufacturer can issue its own declaration of conformity; Japan requires a responsible party inside Japan to answer for the product's PSE compliance — normally a local Japanese company acting as the importing business operator. This is a legal requirement, not an option.
Which notification and record-keeping duties the responsible party carries, and under what name it files them, depend on the product attributes and the Ministerial Ordinance in force. It is worth fixing the responsible party at project kick-off rather than looking for one after testing is finished — a great deal of lost time comes from exactly this step.
Mark and Label Requirements
Compliance of the PSE mark is often underestimated. It is not just a matter of printing a circle or a diamond, but of a set of information that has to hold true at the same time:
Must be marked on the product itself
The Circle or Diamond PSE mark has to be placed on the product itself, together with the manufacturer name, rated voltage, rated current and rated power. Marking only on the packaging or in the manual does not meet the requirement.
Diamond and Circle cannot be mixed
The shape of the mark reflects the item classification, not customer preference. Putting a Circle mark on a Diamond item turns a product that needs third-party certification into a self-declaration — in effect, improper marking.
Japanese manual and warnings
The manual must include Japanese, and the safety warnings must be in Japanese. English may appear alongside but cannot replace the Japanese wording.
Wireless products add the technical conformity mark
Products with a wireless transmitter also need the technical conformity mark (技適マーク / 技術基準適合証明) plus the certification number, displayed on the product together with the PSE mark; the two cannot substitute for each other.
Technical details such as the size, proportions, colour and placement of the mark follow the Ministerial Ordinance in force and the relevant public notices. When designing the nameplate, it is worth laying out the PSE mark, the technical conformity mark and the manufacturer / responsible party information in a single pass, to avoid reworking the tooling later.
How PSE Relates to MIC Wireless Certification
This relationship comes up a lot when exporting to Japan. Put simply: PSE governs "electrical safety", MIC governs "radio waves" — two sets of regulations, two regulators, two independent processes; a product that both connects to the mains and transmits wirelessly needs both.
| Dimension | PSE (Electrical Appliances and Materials Safety Act) | MIC technical conformity certification (formerly TELEC) |
|---|---|---|
| Regulator | Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) | Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC) |
| What it covers | Electrical safety: insulation, temperature rise, construction, materials | Radio transmission: frequency tolerance, occupied bandwidth, transmit power, spurious emissions, antenna gain and directivity |
| Applicable standards | Ministerial Ordinance technical standards, referencing JIS | MIC public notices No. 88 (2.4GHz), No. 157 (5GHz), etc. |
| Third party required | Diamond: mandatory third party; Circle: self-declaration allowed | Certification required, obtaining the technical conformity mark and certification number |
| Factory inspection | Required for Diamond | Not required |
| Reference timeline | Circle 3-5 weeks / Diamond 6-10 weeks | 3-6 weeks |
| Mark | Circle or Diamond PSE mark | Technical conformity mark + certification number (Japanese format) |
| Japan representative | Japan responsible party required | Japan representative required |
The two projects can run in parallel, but their test content does not overlap and neither replaces the other. For a mains-powered product with wireless, it is worth scheduling "PSE + MIC" as two parallel tracks from the start and preparing samples and documents once. Details of the wireless side are in the Japan MIC / PSE knowledge base entry, and the overall service is on the Japan MIC / PSE certification service page.
Can CE / UL Reports Be Reused
The short answer: they can be referenced, but they cannot simply be converted into a certificate.
On technical standards, Japan's PSE technical standards reference JIS standards and now trend toward IEC 62368-1. That means a CE (LVD) report or a UL report based on IEC 62368-1 overlaps to a fair degree with PSE in terms of test items and judging logic, and the engineering data can be used as part of the technical file to reduce duplicate testing and shorten the back-and-forth.
Procedurally, however, they cannot substitute for one another: Diamond PSE must be certified by a third-party conformity assessment body accredited by METI, and reports from EU notified bodies or US NRTLs sit outside that certification system; Circle PSE can be self-declared, but the technical standards the declaration rests on are still the Japanese Ministerial Ordinance, so assessment records against the Japanese requirements are needed.
Common Pitfalls
Judging PSE by voltage
Japan runs on 100V / 50-60Hz, close to the 110V North American situation, with NEMA 1-15 plugs (two flat pins, no earth), so it is easy to assume "the US approach works here". Whether a product is controlled depends on the item category, not on the voltage.
The adapter gets missed
The finished product is cleared as Circle, and only then does it turn out that the in-box adapter is a Diamond item. The adapter either needs its own certification or has to be an already-compliant existing model.
Marking only on the packaging
The PSE mark has to be on the product itself, together with the manufacturer name and rated parameters. Designing the packaging first and changing the product later is a frequent rework point.
Shipping without a Japan responsible party
The responsible party is a legal requirement, not a channel preference. Without one, a shipment can be stopped at customs clearance or at platform listing.
An all-English manual
The manual must include Japanese, and safety warnings must be worded in Japanese. English support is fine; replacing Japanese is not.
Nameplate inconsistent with the filing
Manufacturer name, trademark, model and ratings must match across the nameplate, the report and the responsible party's documents; any mismatch can trigger a request for further explanation.
Doing PSE and forgetting MIC
Products with a wireless transmitter also need the technical conformity mark and certification number; the two run in parallel and do not cover each other.
Scheduling as if it were "just issuing a certificate"
Document review on the Japanese side is detailed and questions are frequent. Allowing time for rework and supplementary documents is more realistic than compressing the test period. To check the category first, use the certification quick lookup.
Key Facts
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Name of the law | Electrical Appliances and Materials Safety Act (電気用品安全法), commonly called the PSE Act |
| Regulator | Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) |
| Two kinds of mark | Diamond PSE = Specified Electrical Appliances; Circle PSE = Non-Specified Electrical Appliances |
| Third-party requirement | Diamond must be certified by a third-party conformity assessment body accredited by METI; Circle may be self-declared |
| Factory inspection | Required for Diamond, with routine inspections; not required for Circle |
| Reference timeline | Circle 3-5 weeks, Diamond 6-10 weeks (from sample arrival at the laboratory, excluding shipping and queuing) |
| Japan responsible party | Required, normally a local Japanese company acting as the importing business operator and carrying the compliance responsibility |
| Mark location | On the product itself, together with the manufacturer name and the rated voltage / current / power; not on packaging alone |
| Language requirement | Manual includes Japanese; safety warnings in Japanese |
| Technical standards | Item 1 / Item 2 of the Ministerial Ordinance, referencing JIS C 6950, JIS C 6065, trending toward IEC 62368-1 (subject to the Ministerial Ordinance in force) |
| Relation to wireless certification | PSE and MIC technical conformity certification are independent and parallel; neither replaces the other |
FAQs
Circle PSE allows self-declaration, so does that mean no testing is needed?
Does a purely battery-powered product with no adapter need PSE?
Does Diamond PSE always require a factory inspection?
I already have CE or UL reports — do I still need retesting for Japan?
Exporting products to Japan?
Tell us whether the product connects to the mains, whether it contains wireless, and whether an adapter is in the box, and we will map out the Diamond / Circle PSE and MIC routes for you
📩 Free certification path review